REFERENCES
Anderson, S.E., & Gansneder, B.M. (1995). Using electronic mail surveys and computer Monitored data for studying computer mediated communication systems. Social Science Computer Review, 13(1), 3346.
Babbie, E. (2000). The Practice of Social Research, 9th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning Publishers.
Bachmann, D., & Elfrink, J.(1996). Tracking the progress of e-mail versus snail-mail. Marketing Research, 8(2), 31-35.
Bernhardt, J.M. & Hubley, J. (2001). Health education and the Internet: The beginning of a revolution. Health Education Research, 16, 643-645.
Colorado State University. (2003). Writing@CSU: Writing Guide. Retrieved December 29, 2003 from http:/ /writing.colostate.edu/references/research/survey/com3bl.cfm.
Cook, C., Heath, E, & Thompson, R.L. (2000). A meta analysis of response rates in Web or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821-836.
Dillman, D.A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Herbert Research Online. (2004). Quality Control. Retrieved January 6, 2004 from http:// www.herbertresearch.com/background/quality.html.
Kittleson, M.J. (1995). An assessment of the response rate via the Postal Service and e-mail. Health Values, 19(2), 27-39.
Kittleson, M.J. (1997a). The History of the HEDIR: One Person's View. American Journal of Health Studies, 13(4), 215-220.
Kittleson, M.J. (1997b). Determining effective follow-up of e-mail surveys. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(3), 193-196.
Kittleson, M.J. (1999). A simple guide to putting evaluation assessments onto the Web. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2(3), 94-100. [Online] Available: www.iejhe.org. Reston, VA: American Association for Health Education [Producer and Distributor].
Marketing Research Association. (2002). Respondent Cooperation/Current Rates. Retrieved January 6, 2004 from http://www.mra-net.org/resources/repondent_cooperation.
Mavis, B.E. & Brocato, J.]. (1998), Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 21(3), 395-408.
NTIA and the Economics and Statistics Administration. (2002). A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. Retrieved March 24, 2004 from the www: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ ntiahome/dn/index.html
O'Rourke, T.W. (1999). The importance of adequate response rates and ways to improve it. Journal of American Health Studies, 15(2), 107-109.
Parker, L. (1992). Collecting data the e-mail way. Training and Development, 52-54.
Pealer LN, Weiler RM. (2000). Web-based health survey research: A primer. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24(1), 69-72.
Schonlau, S., Fricker, R.D., & Elliott, M.N. (2001). Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web. Rand Publications, Washington, DC.
Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2).
Sproull, L.S. (1986). Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 159-169
Tse, A. (1998). Comparing the response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: E-mail vs. mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40(4), 353-361.
Web Surveyor. (2003). Traditional vs. Online Survey Methods. Retrieved December 29, 2003 from http://www.Websurveyor.com/survey-costs.asp.
Weible, R., & Wallace, J. (1998). The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research, 10 (3), 19-23.
Yun, G.W., & Trumbo, C.W. (2000). Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6: 1. [Online] Available: http://www.ascusc.org/ jcmc/vol6/issuel/yun.html. Anneberg School for Communication, University of Southern California [Producer and Distributor].
Mark J. Kittleson, PhD Stephen L. Brown, PhD
